BOOK A DEMO
START FOR FREE
icon icon
BOOK A DEMO
START FREE TRIAL
aqua vs Kualitee

Which modern test management solution is better?

▶Page updated — February 17, 2026

aqua and Kualitee are both modern test management solutions designed to streamline QA processes. Initially, aqua was nearly the only platform on the market to have AI capabilities. As of now, both aqua and Kualitee offer AI agents and related features. This guide will help you determine which platform aligns with your testing requirements in just 10 minutes.

Key differences between aqua and Kualitee

aqua is a complete ALM solution with deeper traceability features

aqua provides unlimited free Guest licenses vs. Kualitee's paid Viewer licenses

Kualitee uses a credit-based model for AI features called Hootie AI

How we compare

Key differences between aqua and Kualitee

AI

A modern AI testing assistant should cut manual effort across the test lifecycle, from generating test cases to flagging coverage gaps. Key capabilities to look for:

  • Automatic test case generation from requirements, documents, or UI screenshots
  • Support for multiple input formats including text and images
  • Context-aware suggestions that learn from your specific project
  • Auto-complete and deduplication without manual cleanup
  • Predictable pricing that scales with team usage

Both platforms offer AI capabilities with different approaches. aqua’s AI Copilot is currently free and uses “grounding” to learn from your workspace context. Kualitee’s Hootie AI operates on a paid credit system for test generation and execution.

Kualitee-logo-
Generate tests from requirements
Generate tests from requirements
Generate tests from images/UI
Generate tests from images/UI
Generate tests from BRD/documents
Generate tests from BRD/documents
Integrates with automation frameworks
Test execution integration is credit-based with Hootie
Context-aware AI (learns from your project)
Limited
Auto-complete test drafts
Not available
Prioritise tests
Not available
Remove duplicates
Not available
Generate tests from requirements
Generate tests from images/UI
Generate tests from BRD/documents
Integrates with automation frameworks
Context-aware AI (learns from your project)
Auto-complete test drafts
Prioritise tests
Remove duplicates
Kualitee-logo-
Generate tests from requirements
Generate tests from images/UI
Generate tests from BRD/documents
Test execution integration is credit-based with Hootie
Limited
Not available
Not available
Not available

Verdict: It’s a tie. aqua offers more free AI features, while Kualitee provides unique test execution but uses costly pricing.

Try aqua AI

Test management

Test management is the core of any QA platform. The features that matter most are the ones that keep your team organised and your data traceable. Look for:

  • Creation, execution, and sharing of test cases within a single workspace
  • Test grouping into scenarios and folders with label support
  • Fast navigation with filters and both personal and shared views
  • Full execution history per test case
  • Workspace-wide change logging for compliance needs
  • Visual coverage mapping across requirements, test cases, and defects

aqua and Kualitee are both strong test management solutions. Kualitee, however, lacks some essential time-savers for organising QA work. It also does not have workspace-wide logging. This functionality is valuable for any company that cares about transparency and traceability, and it is essential for companies in heavily regulated industries.

Kualitee-logo-
Test cases, test scenarios, bulk operations, custom fields
Test cases, test scenarios, bulk operations, custom fields
Execution history
Execution history
Quick navigation, filters, views
Quick navigation, filters, views
Item change history
Item change history
Custom workflows
Custom workflows
Shared views
Shared views
Nested/modular test cases
Nested/modular test cases
Requirements traceability matrix
Requirements traceability matrix
Complete workspace logging (audit trail)
Per-item only
Item change reversal
Not Available
Test cases, test scenarios, bulk operations, custom fields
Execution history
Quick navigation, filters, views
Item change history
Custom workflows
Shared views
Nested/modular test cases
Requirements traceability matrix
Complete workspace logging (audit trail)
Item change reversal
Kualitee-logo-
Test cases, test scenarios, bulk operations, custom fields
Execution history
Quick navigation, filters, views
Item change history
Custom workflows
Shared views
Nested/modular test cases
Requirements traceability matrix
Per-item only
Not Available
Verdict: aqua wins with complete workspace-wide audit trails and change reversal for compliance vs Kualitee's per-item history tracking.

Integrations

A well-integrated test management tool keeps QA data in sync with the rest of your stack. When evaluating integrations, look for:

  • Native two-way sync with issue trackers like Jira and Azure DevOps
  • Support for multiple automation frameworks out of the box
  • CI/CD pipeline connections for automated test reporting
  • Version control links to tie tests to specific code changes
  • Project management tool support to keep QA aligned with delivery

Both platforms offer strong integration ecosystems. aqua provides deeper integration with Jira through real-time bi-directional sync and supports more automation frameworks. Meanwhile, Kualitee offers broader project management tool coverage.

Kualitee-logo-
REST API
REST API
Project management tools
Project management tools
Jira Real-time bi-directional sync
Jira standard integration
Jira plugin (aqua4Jira)
Jira plugin (Confluence integration)
Confluence integration
Not Available
Test automation tools (Selenium, Jenkins, JMeter, SoapUI, Ranorex, UFT, Playwright, Cucumber, TestComplete, plus REST API)
Test automation tools (Selenium, Playwright, Automation Reports via integration)
CI/CD tools (Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOps)
CI/CD tools (Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOps)
Version control (GitHub integration)
Version control (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket)
Bug reporting tool (Capture )
Not Available
Communication tools (Integrations)
Communication tools (Slack)
REST API
Project management tools
Jira Real-time bi-directional sync
Jira plugin (aqua4Jira)
Confluence integration
Test automation tools (Selenium, Jenkins, JMeter, SoapUI, Ranorex, UFT, Playwright, Cucumber, TestComplete, plus REST API)
CI/CD tools (Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOps)
Version control (GitHub integration)
Bug reporting tool (Capture )
Communication tools (Integrations)
Kualitee-logo-
REST API
Project management tools
Jira standard integration
Jira plugin (Confluence integration)
Not Available
Test automation tools (Selenium, Playwright, Automation Reports via integration)
CI/CD tools (Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOps)
Version control (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket)
Not Available
Communication tools (Slack)
Verdict: aqua excels with 10+ automation frameworks, while Kualitee offers broader project management tool coverage.

Pricing flexibility

Pricing models vary significantly between test management platforms and can have a major impact on total cost as your team grows. A pricing structure worth considering should offer:

  • A free or trial tier for evaluation without commitment
  • Per-user pricing that scales predictably with team size
  • Low-cost or free access for stakeholders who only need read access
  • Separate license tiers for different roles such as testers and managers
  • Published pricing that does not require a sales conversation

This is where the platforms differ most significantly. aqua offers unlimited free Guest licenses for read-only stakeholders and affordable Scout licenses for manual testers. Kualitee has a true free-forever plan with limitations but charges $7 monthly for each Viewer license.

Kualitee-logo-
Free trial available
Growth plan: Free forever (1 project, 500 test cases, 200 defects, 3 users, 3 AI credits/month)
Entry-level paid plan from ~39 EUR/month
Entry-level paid plan (Hypergrowth: $12/user/month or $108/user/year)
Free licenses for view-only (Unlimited Guest licenses)
Free licenses for view-only (Viewer licenses: $7/month or $84/year)
Free licenses for manual testers (Scout licenses)
Not available
AI pricing (Free)
Credit-based: $30 (250 credits), $60 (500 credits), $100 (1000 credits)
Custom Enterprise plan
Not available
Monthly, annual, multi-year billing flexibility
Monthly, annual billing flexibility
Free trial available
Entry-level paid plan from ~39 EUR/month
Free licenses for view-only (Unlimited Guest licenses)
Free licenses for manual testers (Scout licenses)
AI pricing (Free)
Custom Enterprise plan
Monthly, annual, multi-year billing flexibility
Kualitee-logo-
Growth plan: Free forever (1 project, 500 test cases, 200 defects, 3 users, 3 AI credits/month)
Entry-level paid plan (Hypergrowth: $12/user/month or $108/user/year)
Free licenses for view-only (Viewer licenses: $7/month or $84/year)
Not available
Credit-based: $30 (250 credits), $60 (500 credits), $100 (1000 credits)
Not available
Monthly, annual billing flexibility

Verdict: It's a tie. Kualitee wins on a free-forever plan, while aqua wins on unlimited free Guest licenses for larger teams.

Try aqua for free

Deployment Models

Where your QA data is hosted affects security, compliance, and operational control. A platform worth evaluating should support:

  • Vendor-hosted cloud with clear data residency options
  • On-premise deployment for teams with strict sovereignty requirements
  • Private or custom cloud options for regulated industries
  • Transparent setup requirements for each deployment model
  • Encryption standards and GDPR compliance across all hosting options

Both platforms support cloud and on-premise deployment. aqua offers more flexibility with custom cloud options on any Azure datacenter. Kualitee provides US and EU hosting options.

Kualitee-logo-
GDPR-compliant German cloud
US and EU data hosting cloud available
On-premise deployment
Annual license, minimum 10 users
Custom/Private Cloud (any Azure data center)
Not Available
On-premise pricing (contact sales)
On-premise $292/user/year (minimum 10 users, plus installation fees)
Data residency options Germany (default), custom Azure regions
Data residency options US or EU
GDPR-compliant German cloud
On-premise deployment
Custom/Private Cloud (any Azure data center)
On-premise pricing (contact sales)
Data residency options Germany (default), custom Azure regions
Kualitee-logo-
US and EU data hosting cloud available
Annual license, minimum 10 users
Not Available
On-premise $292/user/year (minimum 10 users, plus installation fees)
Data residency options US or EU
Verdict: aqua wins with custom Azure datacenter deployment for data sovereignty requirements, while Kualitee offers clear on-premise pricing and US/EU hosting.

Dashboards

Dashboards should give teams and stakeholders an at-a-glance view of testing health without manual reporting effort. A strong dashboard feature set includes:

  • Visibility across test cases, defects, and requirements in one place
  • Multiple chart types to suit different reporting needs
  • Personal and shared dashboard configurations
  • Role-specific views for testers, developers, and managers
  • Automated alerts when KPIs deviate from expected thresholds

Kualitee has made significant improvements to dashboards since 2023, adding more chart types and filtering options. aqua maintains an edge with greater customisation depth and AI-powered KPI alerts.

Kualitee-logo-
Role-specific dashboards
Role-specific dashboards
Shared vs. personal dashboards
Shared vs. personal dashboards
Data scope (any workspace data)
Data scope (15+ key data slices)
Chart types (Pie, bar, stacked bar, table, custom combinations)
Chart types (Pie charts, line graphs)
Fully customizable
Pre-configured with filters
KPI Alerts (automated anomaly detection)
Not Available
Role-specific dashboards
Shared vs. personal dashboards
Data scope (any workspace data)
Chart types (Pie, bar, stacked bar, table, custom combinations)
Fully customizable
KPI Alerts (automated anomaly detection)
Kualitee-logo-
Role-specific dashboards
Shared vs. personal dashboards
Data scope (15+ key data slices)
Chart types (Pie charts, line graphs)
Pre-configured with filters
Not Available
Verdict: aqua wins withcustomizable dashboards and automated KPI alerts vs Kualitee's pre-configured dashboards with filtering options.

Reporting

Reports are how QA teams communicate progress and quality risk to the wider organisation. A capable reporting module should allow teams to:

  • Access pre-built templates for common QA report types
  • Customise report layouts and visual formatting
  • Pull data from any part of the project, not just predefined fields
  • Export reports in multiple formats for different audiences
  • Schedule and automate report delivery

Kualitee provides template-based reports with limited customisation that work well for standard needs. aqua offers full AI-driven report functionality with extensive customisation capabilities.

Kualitee-logo-
Template library
Template library
Full Report Wizard
Templates only, no custom layouts
Use any project data
Limited to predefined reports
Text & image formatting
Limited
Drag-and-drop
Not Available
External data & imagery
Not Available
Advanced charts and diagrams
Basic
Pivot tables
Not Available
Custom scripts
Not Available
Report parametrization & automation
Schedule reports
Export formats (PDF, Word, Excel, HTML)
Export formats (PDF, standard formats)
Template library
Full Report Wizard
Use any project data
Text & image formatting
Drag-and-drop
External data & imagery
Advanced charts and diagrams
Pivot tables
Custom scripts
Report parametrization & automation
Export formats (PDF, Word, Excel, HTML)
Kualitee-logo-
Template library
Templates only, no custom layouts
Limited to predefined reports
Limited
Not Available
Not Available
Basic
Not Available
Not Available
Schedule reports
Export formats (PDF, standard formats)
Verdict: aqua wins with fully customizable Report Wizard for complex needs, while Kualitee's template-based reports work well for standard use.

User management

Controlling who can view, edit, and manage test assets is essential for data integrity and security. A solid user management system should provide:

  • Role-based access control with sensible defaults
  • Custom role definitions tailored to your team structure
  • Per-user permissions that go beyond role assignments
  • Single sign-on support for enterprise authentication
  • Flexible license types for different levels of platform access

Both platforms provide solid user management foundations. aqua offers individual user permissions beyond role-based access, which gives finer control for complex team structures.

Kualitee-logo-
SSO
SSO
Default user roles
Default user roles
Custom roles
Custom roles
Individual permissions
Role permissions only
License types (Full, Scout, Guest)
License types (Standard, Viewer)
SSO
Default user roles
Custom roles
Individual permissions
License types (Full, Scout, Guest)
Kualitee-logo-
SSO
Default user roles
Custom roles
Role permissions only
License types (Standard, Viewer)
Verdict: aqua wins with per-user permissions for complex team structures versus Kualitee's standard role-based access control.

ALM

A full ALM platform connects every phase of software delivery, from requirements through to defect resolution. When evaluating ALM capabilities, look for:

  • End-to-end traceability linking requirements, test cases, and defects
  • Built-in requirements management rather than import-only support
  • Defect tracking integrated directly with test execution
  • Sprint and release planning aligned with development cycles
  • Project management features that give teams full lifecycle visibility

Both platforms have expanded beyond pure test management. aqua offers a more complete ALM solution from inception. Kualitee now includes project and requirement management capabilities, having grown from a test management core.

Kualitee-logo-
Test case management
Test case management
Defect management
Defect management
Requirements → Tests → Defects traceability
Requirements → Tests → Defects traceability
Sprint/release management
Sprint/release management
Requirements management
Import and traceability
Full project tracking
Build/module organization project management
Test case management
Defect management
Requirements → Tests → Defects traceability
Sprint/release management
Requirements management
Full project tracking
Kualitee-logo-
Test case management
Defect management
Requirements → Tests → Defects traceability
Sprint/release management
Import and traceability
Build/module organization project management
Verdict: Both platforms provide complete ALM capabilities

What people say

Here are a few things people like and dislike about both tools.

Kualitee-logo-
star star star star star

“I was surprised to find such a comprehensive and mature tool for test management in the German market without having taken it seriously beforehand.”

Jörg Großmann

Head of Development at Bank 11

star star star

“The user interface is not friendly, but the features are very good. Sometimes it takes time to load, and the page is not responsive. It would be great if adding test cases into the test execution cycle was faster.”

Marcello M.

Research Assistant at a small business (<50 emp.)

star star star star star

“The reporting is meaningful and provides a good basis for decisions. After the employees have used aqua, they recognize the added value very quickly.”

Thomas Haeske

Head of Organisation/IT at Berlin Hyp

star star star

“Not user friendly, it's confusing and not always helpful. The audit trail for each defect doesn't do a good job of recording past history and hence, data becomes hard to analyse.”

Mirza Usama B.

Associate Software Engineer (50-1000 emp.)

star star star star star

“Manual test cases are easily automated with aqua. Seamless integration with test automation tools helps here.”

Jörn-Hendrick Sörensen

Test Manager at KBA

star star star

“I like Defect Management, User Management, and Global Dashboards. I dislike the slowness of the application. Sometimes, it gets slower than the expected behaviour for applications of this kind. “

Kashif S.

Principal Software Engineer at a small business (<50 emp.)

star star star star star

“I was surprised to find such a comprehensive and mature tool for test management in the German market without having taken it seriously beforehand.”

Jörg Großmann

Head of Development at Bank 11

star star star star star

“The reporting is meaningful and provides a good basis for decisions. After the employees have used aqua, they recognize the added value very quickly.”

Thomas Haeske

Head of Organisation/IT at Berlin Hyp

star star star star star

“Manual test cases are easily automated with aqua. Seamless integration with test automation tools helps here.”

Jörn-Hendrick Sörensen

Test Manager at KBA

Kualitee-logo-
star star star

“The user interface is not friendly, but the features are very good. Sometimes it takes time to load, and the page is not responsive. It would be great if adding test cases into the test execution cycle was faster.”

Marcello M.

Research Assistant at a small business (<50 emp.)

star star star

“Not user friendly, it's confusing and not always helpful. The audit trail for each defect doesn't do a good job of recording past history and hence, data becomes hard to analyse.”

Mirza Usama B.

Associate Software Engineer (50-1000 emp.)

star star star

“I like Defect Management, User Management, and Global Dashboards. I dislike the slowness of the application. Sometimes, it gets slower than the expected behaviour for applications of this kind. “

Kashif S.

Principal Software Engineer at a small business (<50 emp.)

Final verdict

aqua offers a more complete solution for organisations that need deep traceability and custom reporting. For teams seeking test management with AI-powered automation and complete ALM capabilities, aqua delivers comprehensive value. Kualitee provides excellent value for smaller teams that want transparent pricing and straightforward test management.

Kualitee-logo-
AI is free, deeply integrated, context-aware
Credit-based, includes unique test execution feature
Pricing is transparent but requies contacting sales
Clear tiered pricing with free-forever plan
Unlimited Guest licenses
Paid Viewer licenses ($7/month)
Automation integrations (10+ native frameworks)
Selenium + Playwright + automation reports
Workspace-wide complete logging & audit trails
Per-item only
Full Report Wizard
Template-based only reporting
Cloud, Custom Cloud, On-Premise deployment flexibility
Cloud (US/EU), On-Premise
Full ALM from inception
ALM capabilities added to test management core
AI is free, deeply integrated, context-aware
Pricing is transparent but requies contacting sales
Unlimited Guest licenses
Automation integrations (10+ native frameworks)
Workspace-wide complete logging & audit trails
Full Report Wizard
Cloud, Custom Cloud, On-Premise deployment flexibility
Full ALM from inception
Kualitee-logo-
Credit-based, includes unique test execution feature
Clear tiered pricing with free-forever plan
Paid Viewer licenses ($7/month)
Selenium + Playwright + automation reports
Per-item only
Template-based only reporting
Cloud (US/EU), On-Premise
ALM capabilities added to test management core

Winner

Try aqua for free

FAQ

How does aqua ALM pricing compare to Kualitee now?

Kualitee offers more transparent pricing with a free-forever plan limited to 3 users and 500 test cases. The paid tier costs $12 per user monthly. aqua’s exact pricing requires a sales conversation. aqua does offer unlimited free Guest licenses, which can significantly reduce costs for large teams with many stakeholders. Kualitee charges $7 monthly for each Viewer license.

What's the difference in AI pricing between the two platforms?

aqua’s AI Copilot is currently free for all cloud users. Future pricing will be announced at least 2 months before implementation. Kualitee uses a credit-based model with three tiers: $30 for 250 credits, $60 for 500 credits, or $100 for 1000 credits. Free plan users receive 3 AI credits monthly, while paid users receive 10 AI credits monthly.

Which platform has better AI for test generation?

Both platforms generate tests from requirements and images. aqua’s AI learns from your project through a grounding feature and can also generate from voice notes. Additional capabilities include auto-complete, prioritisation, and duplicate removal. Kualitee’s Hootie AI offers unique test execution with automatic status updates and defect logging. aqua provides more generation features, while Kualitee covers execution in a way aqua does not.

Do both support On-Premise deployment?

Yes, both platforms offer On-Premise deployment. Kualitee’s pricing is transparent at $292 per user annually with a 10-user minimum, and installation fees apply separately. aqua requires contacting sales for On-Premise pricing.

Which has better integration with Jira?

aqua offers real-time bi-directional synchronisation with Jira. Changes sync automatically in both directions without manual intervention. Kualitee offers standard Jira integration plus a free plugin that allows teams to review test cases and reports directly within the Jira interface. Both approaches work well, though aqua’s sync runs deeper while Kualitee’s plugin adds convenience within Jira itself.

Home » aqua vs Kualitee: Which Modern Test Management Solution Is Better?